Haven’t really tried my hand at writing a review before but as long as I’m on such a reading kick, seems like a good avenue to explore. Especially given that the book I just finished surprised the hell out of me.
So, I read the first installment of A Court of Thorns and Roses (Sarah J. Maas) last winter and while I can say I genuinely enjoyed it, it didn’t blow me away or anything. I love the world-building Maas undertakes; love the Fae and the courts and the way magic works. I like the new spin on an old fairy tale motif- heavy beauty & the beast vibes. It was a solid balance of action and romance. But there were problems- little, subtle details that didn’t make sense to me, and which detracted from the overall story; problems that I had simply attributed to sloppy writing.
And yet, all over Instagram, book bloggers were going bananas for the second installment and I thought, what am I missing here? So I finally got around to reading A Court of Mist and Fury and… holy cow. Every little inconsistency that I had chalked up to a difference of opinion with the author turned out to be CAREFULLY SEEDED PARTS OF THE PLOT?? I couldn’t believe it. Blew my freakin’ mind. Gotta give credit to Maas for having the guts to play the long game because it really, really paid off.
I don’t want to spoil anything for those who are considering picking up the series (which I recommend!) so I’ll save my deeper reflections about the way relationships are explored between installments for a different post.
Can’t wait to start reading the next one!